In additon these are not meaningless connections, he was tasked with appointing people to come up with a defense plan and he allows 11 of 14 of the people to be PROGRESSIVES?? Really?? No one is perfect, but use some common sense here, what was he thinking? Was he bullied by Frank??

It is my pleasure to read and respond to the Natiional Right To work petition. I write to you as one who has been a bit put off by the sluggish pace at which the American Jobs Act has been dragged along, finally, undergoing near decimation by the President’s efforts at circumventing congressional action, completely. In particular, it seemed rather factitious , on the part of the President, that Congress was not provided his approval to move forward with the complete adoption of the full AJA prior to the close of 2011.

As I take the manner by which these actions had been carruied out, I take offense to that which appears to be an attempt at preventing the implementation of a new and very significant jobs initiative.

As a delegate, I have agonized over such decision made by President Obama to elect an Executive Order in the place of approaching Congress. While it is undeniably important that legislation be moved forweward by some authotrity, it remains eqally imkportant that U.S. citizens are representted by their elected state and federal officials. If the votes of the American people are significant, their needs and opinion is as significant and must be taken into consideration by the nation’s highest authority.

As a future employer, it is my hope to provide jobs offered to an unemployed community of Americans without forcing their hand by assessing any cost to the laborer for the work performed. Income taxes place enough negative weight against the incomes of the American worker. My goal and constant prayer is to know that work can be created in an economy that prepares for jobs to be had by the historically unemployed American. As well, it is one of my primary concerns that jobs are created through such efforts that provide for private and federal recognition of the community level needs iand engage in the support of an increase in domestic productivity.

In our nation, this would signify a new horizon that can only be successfully reached when the federal government offers it’s full support to the need for increasing jobs availability. These goals can be accomplished when an approach to re-designing the foundation of America’s employment resources resevoir positively impacts upon the community of HUGs (historically unemplyed groups) to address and, thereafter, implement the effects of job creation, without subduing or failing them.

Other possibilities for creating jobs are centered in the effort to supplant the burden of federal aid and anti-poverty programs, currently harboured by the federal government in an agenda that provdes entitlement outlays to America’s needing people. with a jobs initiative that targets those who have historically made up the rolls of anti-poverty programs can serve as a step toward eliminating increasing numbers of benefits going out of the government till that do not pay back revenues by way of income taxation. Talk about your win-win situations. How can American lose when the federal government does what is necessary to enhance the growth and stability of the national econmy? We Can’t Lose!

I would like to close by stating my purpose for gathering more information in regard to the National Right to Work Act in the hope that H.R. 2040 receives the proper consideration by Congress and the President and to, also, seek areas within the precepts of this plan that include the long standing concerns of the community and members of organized labor unions and demonstrates concern , as well, for the historically unemployed people of America.

–
michellecsinfo@gmail.com